I don’t know, Keith. I feel like you might want to ask someone at Wizards since there’s no one here who isn’t going to give you an opinion on the rules.I'm looking for actual answers here, not edgy opinions. Thanks in advance.

I don’t know, Keith. I feel like you might want to ask someone at Wizards since there’s no one here who isn’t going to give you an opinion on the rules.I'm looking for actual answers here, not edgy opinions. Thanks in advance.
You are dismissing an argument for a difference in philosophy, not because of an actual fallacy.
Source: Fallacious Follies: Oberoni, Stormwind, and Fallacies OH MY!
I assume you have your answer now: 5e24 does not (generally*) prescribe the order of actions in the multiattack action. Correct?(I'm looking for actual answers here, not edgy opinions. Thanks in advance.)
I feel sorry for the humourless porpoises.
Bottlenose Dolphins are pointier, but they are always laughing at something or other.They're kind of like the box of crayons in a kindergarten classroom.
Pointless.
As my own article states, I am not dismissing an argument because of a difference in philosophy.
I am pointing out that a person should not label the other side's position a fallacy in order to make their own argument seem like the only possible non-fallacious position in order to dismiss other arguments.
In other words, and I may have written about this before (as you know!) at length- don't label things fallacies if they aren't fallacies* to try and win arguments.
*Unless for humorous purposes.
Sorry Snarf.
My post wasnt directed at your article beyond citing it. It was directed at the other quoted post. I cited your article because it stated the issue so well.