WotC Mike Mearls: "I Was Not Fired From D&D"

Screenshot 2025-02-03 at 1.08.07 PM.png

Back in 2019, Dungeons & Dragons designer Mike Mearls left the D&D team to work on Magic: the Gathering. This move happened shortly after a controversy regarding abuse allegation within the TTRPG industry and the way many people alleged that Mearls handled the complaints and investigation, with a common rumour being that he was moved from the D&D team in order to move him out of the spotlight. In this recent interview with D&D historian Ben Riggs, Mearls denies that this was the motivation for the move, stating that Wizards of the Coast was moving D&D in a direction he no longer wanted to work on, and that the opportunity came up to work on Magic: the Gathering.

Ben Riggs: Since you brought up X and your return to it, I’ll ask about your departure from it. For three years, people were like, "Mike Mearls was fired from D&D in some way, shape, or form." So—were you fired from D&D?

Mike Mearls: I was not fired from D&D. And, you know, I don’t want to go into too many details about everything that happened back then because it was, like—oh, you know what? That was four or five years ago. But no.

It was actually kind of interesting. And I wonder if part of my social media thing is that a lot of the people who really latched onto that and all this weird conspiracy theory—like, I don’t know—maybe they’re all on some other social network now? Or maybe it just isn’t as interesting if the guy isn’t working. But no, no—I left. And I don’t really want to get into it too much, and honestly, there aren’t really any great details. But I moved over to Magic: The Gathering. I had the chance to work on Magic.

I’d been working on some digital tools for D&D, and I—well, I know there was this thing where someone publicly said I was no longer working on D&D, and I was like—no, that never happened. I have no idea why that happened, but I’m not even going to touch that. But I was working on digital tools, and then the company was looking at, "What do we want to do with digital? What’s our next step forward?" I was in favor of a very DM-centric approach. Let’s make tools for DMs. We have D&D Beyond—that’s great for players—but I want tools that will make running D&D faster and easier for me. And, you know, it became a decision about which direction we wanted to go. The company didn’t want to go in that direction. So I was like, well, I’m not really interested in working on something that’s so far from what I want to work on. And that’s why I got the job offer to go work on Magic.

So that was not like, at no point—to be clear—if like a quarter of what people talked about had happened, I would not have kept my job. Like, I really even know what people think happened. But yeah—that was never even close to being on the table.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I mean, obviously he wasn't fired, because he was technically promoted. But whatever the reasoning was, he stopped being directly in charge of D&D. So this feels a bit "the lady doth protest too much" to me, I mean, just vibes-wise. Also, whatever the reasoning was, the fact is, it took him out of the spotlight with excellent timing, and he stopped posting on Twitter for reasons unknown and he still doesn't state why here.

Re: the working on tools for DMs, the statement that WotC weren't interested in that is interesting because during 4E, WotC were very much interested in that, and then a year or two after Mearls left D&D, WotC started working on precisely that again. Bad timing?
 

Re: the working on tools for DMs, the statement that WotC weren't interested in that is interesting because during 4E, WotC were very much interested in that, and then a year or two after Mearls left D&D, WotC started working on precisely that again. Bad timing?
Does anyone know what the timing window was between Mike moving over from D&D to Magic and then WotC's acquisition of D&D Beyond? Because it was DDB that seemed to fast-track things like the Encounter Builder for WotC's D&D work, which would have been the kind of thing he says he was looking to do. Had he already moved over by that point? I have no idea.
 


I mean, obviously he wasn't fired, because he was technically promoted. But whatever the reasoning was, he stopped being directly in charge of D&D. So this feels a bit "the lady doth protest too much" to me, I mean, just vibes-wise. Also, whatever the reasoning was, the fact is, it took him out of the spotlight with excellent timing, and he stopped posting on Twitter for reasons unknown and he still doesn't state why here.

Re: the working on tools for DMs, the statement that WotC weren't interested in that is interesting because during 4E, WotC were very much interested in that, and then a year or two after Mearls left D&D, WotC started working on precisely that again. Bad timing?
Yes. If it was just an amicable shift there would have been some sort of announcement on it. I mean he was the face of dnd and then just gone. So there was some sort of conflict there. And while it might not be because of the controversy I feel like it was something that basically made him disappear from the dnd sphere.
 



Does anyone know what the timing window was between Mike moving over from D&D to Magic and then WotC's acquisition of D&D Beyond?
Only Mike does, and presumably some people at WotC.

We don't know, because it wasn't announced until it had, by WotC's own admission, been the case for some time, and they never specified exactly how long IIRC. Ray Winninger had taken over D&D for quite a while before he got "introduced" to us.

We can guestimate, but that's the best we can do. Mearls got into apparent (and I say "apparent" because he seems to suggest all was completely fine here, but it sure looked like it) in Feb 2019. Vanished from the internet. In what March or April 2020, it was revealed that Ray Winninger was now in Mearls' old role. In May 2022, WotC finalized buying DnDBeyond, which apparently been in the works for many months, so presumably started in 2021 sometime.

The 3D VTT for 5E was sorta-announced in 2022 I believe, correct if I'm wrong - it was Cynthia Williams' project it seems, but she's also left.

So there's like three years or so where WotC apparently went from "HELL NO" to DM supporting stuff to "HELL YES, put 250 developers on this, costing probably several the budget of the D&D team!". Is that unusual in a corporation? Not really, no. I've seen pretty similar happen.

Yes. If it was just an amicable shift there would have been some sort of announcement on it.
Absolutely. And Mike writes like he went straight to MtG, but based on what WotC represented to us, and I think on his own LinkedIn, though I'm not going to check because some people get suuuuuper weiiiiiird about LinkedIn like it's not public or something, was that first he moved to like "D&D brand control" (I forget the exact phrasing, but this is stuff like linking up with Larian), which was a promotion in theory, and then he moved to MtG. We don't know which is true, like if Mike is just using an abbreviated version of events here (no criticism if he is, I don't always explain every single small move of my career either), or if in fact he went straight over and the brand stuff was just a side-gig at the company.

But yeah not only was there not an announcement, which was weird as heck, they didn't announced that Ray Winninger had taken over for several months maybe even a year or more after he did, which is just irregular as hell for a corporation unless something unfortunate has happened (and even then it's a little unusual in my personal experience). And Ray was wildly popular, because he was saying all the right things. Then he got the boot in some form (I sure he "wasn't fired" either, but again at that level, no-one is "fired" the same way us peons are, they take gardening leave or they find another role or they just resign, hopefully with a golden parachute).
 

I don’t know if Y’all just forgot how toxic the Twitter environment surrounding Mearls had gotten at the time, but I’m inclined to believe him when he says it was just a personal choice to get off social media.
I would be inclined to believe it was purely that if his job role didn't shift at the same time, moving from a public-facing to a non-public-facing one. That suggests (no more than suggests) there's maybe a little more going on.

It's also something we've seen in game dev before, where a videogame developer becomes "controversial" (often for just saying dumb/rude stuff repeatedly rather than anything more alarming), and then mysteriously VANISHES from social media and has a promotion or other job role change at the same time. I feel like there's some bargaining going on there.

(This happened with Jeff Kaplan at Blizzard for example. Seemed to fix his problems too, I never saw him troll or even be more than the mildest of jokers after that.)
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top